Dating the book of revelation gentry

One cannot find a single really cogent argument in support of the earlier date. The arguments produced are based on late and unreliable testimonies, on the wholly imaginary idea that John did not yet know his Greek when he wrote the Apocalypse, and on a very questionable literal interpretation of certain passages . A large part of the argument deals with the identity of the beast (666) as Nero Caesar, the first imperial persecutor of the Church. Worth, The Seven Cities of the Apocalypse (1999)"An impressive job of collecting evidence to support his views. "Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation" is a doctoral dissertation seeking to demonstrate that Revelation was written prior to the destruction of the Jewish Temple in AD 70 and that it was prophesying that event. It proves this early date for Revelation by providing both internal evidence from within Revelation and external evidence from Church history and tradition.He has given late-date advocates a challenge for further study." -- Thomas D. It proves this early date for Revelation by providing both internal evidence from within Revelation and external evidence from Church history and tradition. It provides much exposition of the text of Revelation. You need to do a little more research concerning the dating for the Book of Revelation. Beale quotes Swete’s conclusion about the date of Revelation’s authorship with this comment, Sweet’s conclusion about the issue of Revelation’s date reflects a balanced judgment: “To sum up, the earlier date may be right, but the internal evidence is not sufficient to outweigh the firm tradition stemming from Irenaeus.”[3]Dr. Mac Arthur, a premillennialist, makes these comments Those who hold to the early date [pre- A. 70] see in Jerusalem’s destruction the prophesied second coming of Jesus Christ in its first phase. Ken Gentry in his book, “Before Jerusalem Fell” cites evidence for a pre 70 AD date. Robertson and William Foxwell Albright dated the NT as having been written between 20-80 AD! 95 for Revelation is the most credible date for its authorship. External evidence for the earlier (Neronian) date is almost nonexistent. He answers objections to his arguments and addresses the charges of anti-Semitism.

Beale (Revelation: New International Greek Testament Commentary) Victorious Hope Publishing, United States, 2012. A large part of the argument deals with the identity of the beast (666) as Nero Caesar, the first imperial persecutor of the Church.

The church fathers Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Victorinus, Eusebius, and Jerome also affirm that Revelation was written during Domitian’s reign . it is based on the statements of numerous early church fathers.1.

The testimony of the early church that Revelation was written during Domitian’s reign is difficult to explain if it was actually written during Nero’s reign.[4]The evidence supporting a A. 95 authorship for the book of Revelation is not based solely on Irenaeus.

This is a must-read for all serious students of prophecy regardless of their position.

"Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation" is a doctoral dissertation seeking to demonstrate that Revelation was written prior to the destruction of the Jewish Temple in AD 70 and that it was prophesying that event.

Search for dating the book of revelation gentry:

dating the book of revelation gentry-14dating the book of revelation gentry-58dating the book of revelation gentry-5dating the book of revelation gentry-62

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “dating the book of revelation gentry”